来源 自动抓取
作者 Aleksandr V. Korolev, Evgeny F. Talantsev
相关度评分 4.498
主分类 cond-mat.supr-con
发布日期 2026-02-26
研究范式 理论研究
样品形态 未知

摘要

本研究指出,Zhu等人在测量加压Ruddlesden-Popper镍酸盐La4Ni3O10的超导体积分数时,采用了此前未见报道的计算方程,导致结果被显著高估。作者基于Zhu等人公布的原始数据,使用标准超导磁矩计算方法重新分析,发现超导体积分数仅为51%至59%,而非Zhu等人报告的81%至86%。通过检查Zhu等人提供的方程及其推导,作者发现该方程在计算中错误地使用了样品几何参数,导致对超导相所占体积比例的计算出现约两倍的高估。作者以假想样品为例,说明即使超导相实际只占50%,该方程仍会得出接近100%的结果。因此,该错误影响了迄今所有已报道的Ruddlesden-Popper镍酸盐超导体积分数数据,需要重新审视这些结论。

材料

方法

关键词

亮点

  • Identifies a systematic error in the calculation of superconducting volume fraction in pressurized nickelates.
  • Demonstrates with a hypothetical example that even a 50% superconducting fraction would yield near 100% using the incorrect equation.

结论

  • The equation used by Zhu et al. to calculate superconducting volume fraction in La4Ni3O10 is incorrect.
  • The correct calculation yields a superconducting volume fraction of 51-59%, not 81-86% as reported.
  • The error arises from using an incorrect formula that effectively doubles the volume fraction.
  • This error affects all previously reported superconducting volume fractions in Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates.

主要论断

  • The equation used by Zhu et al. overestimates the superconducting volume fraction in La4Ni3O10 by nearly twofold
    • 证据: From abstract: 'the proposed equation and procedure are incorrect, and that this equation results in multiple overestimations of the superconducting volume fraction in the sample',Calculations show ZFC ratio 51-59% vs reported 81-86%

研究流程

本批次暂无数据。