Summary
This study employs 139La nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) spectroscopy to re-examine the crystal structure and spin density wave (SDW) state of ambient-pressure bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7. The experimental observation of two distinct La(2) sites is naturally explained within the low-symmetry Am2m structural framework, whereas previous defect models based on the Amam structure fail to provide a self-consistent description. Within the Am2m structure, the SDW spin configuration is re-identified as a "large-small" spin stripe structure, arising from the distinct large and small magnetic moments associated with two inequivalent Ni sites. Based on DFT+U calculations and NQR parameter analysis, the study confirms the itinerant nature of this SDW order, indicating that it is driven by Fermi surface nesting rather than local magnetic moment mechanisms, thereby providing a foundation for understanding the origin of high-Tc superconductivity in this material under high pressure.
Materials
Methods
Keywords
- spin density wave
- large tiny spin stripe
- itinerant nature
- fermi surface nesting
- am2m structure
- high tc superconductivity
Highlights
- The study resolves long-standing inconsistencies in previous NQR analyses based on the Amam structure by demonstrating that both La(2) sites are intrinsic to the Am2m structure.
- The calculated Ni valences from DFT+U (+2.48 and +2.52) show a significantly smaller valence difference than bond-valence-sum analysis, suggesting that the SDW order is not driven by large charge disproportionation.
Conclusions
- The observation of two distinct La(2) sites in the NQR spectra is naturally accounted for by the Am2m structure without any special assumptions, whereas it cannot be reconciled within the Amam framework.
- Within the Am2m framework, the spin configuration of the SDW phase is identified as a large-tiny spin-stripe structure, arising naturally from two inequivalent Ni sites with large and tiny magnetic moments.
- The SDW order in La3Ni2O7 is driven not by a localized-moment mechanism but by itinerant Fermi-surface nesting.
- These results establish the itinerant nature of the SDW order at ambient pressure in La3Ni2O7, providing a basis for understanding its relationship to the emergence of high-Tc superconductivity under high pressure.
Main claims
- The intrinsic ambient-pressure crystal structure of La3Ni2O7 is the lower-symmetry Am2m structure, not the previously assumed Amam structure.
- Evidence: Observation of two distinct La(2) NQR sites (La(2)a and La(2)b) with 1:1 intensity ratio.,DFT+U calculated NQR parameters for Am2m structure match experimental values, while Amam structure predicts only one La(2) site.,Previous defect models (stacking faults, phase contamination, oxygen vacancies) fail to explain the consistent 1:1 intensity ratio and identical relaxation rates.
- The spin-density-wave (SDW) state in La3Ni2O7 is a large-tiny spin-stripe order.
- Evidence: NQR spectral simulations in the SDW phase show small internal field at La(2)a and large internal field at La(2)b.,La(2)a sites are aligned above tiny-spin Nia channels, and La(2)b sites above large-spin Nib channels.,Consistent with recent neutron scattering and 17O-NMR measurements.
- The SDW order in La3Ni2O7 is itinerant, driven by Fermi-surface nesting, rather than by localized magnetic moments.
- Evidence: DFT+U calculations show a small valence difference between Nia and Nib sites (+2.48 vs +2.52), inconsistent with the large magnetic moment difference observed.,In a localized moment picture, the site with higher electron occupancy (Nia) should have a larger moment, but experimentally μNia < μNib.,This inconsistency supports an itinerant mechanism where Fermi-surface nesting drives the order.
Workflow
- Sample Preparation — High-quality single-phase La3Ni2O7.0 sample was prepared for spectroscopic analysis.
- Materials: Polycrystalline La3Ni2O7+δ (δ=0.0); Solid-state reaction method
- Methods: Solid-state reaction synthesis; X-ray diffraction (XRD) for phase confirmation; Thermogravimetric analysis for oxygen deficiency determination
- Observations: Lattice parameters: a = 5.3920 Å, b = 5.4510 Å, c = 20.533 Å; High-quality sample with minimal La4Ni3O10 secondary phase (≈4%)
- NQR Measurement — Experimental NQR spectra reveal two distinct La(2) sites with equal occupancy, inconsistent with the single-site Amam structure.
- Materials: Coarse powder sample of La3Ni2O7.0
- Methods: 139La Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance (NQR) spectroscopy; Zero external field measurement
- Observations: Two distinct La(2) NQR peaks observed: La(2)a and La(2)b; Sharp spectral linewidths (60 kHz for La(2)a); Integrated intensity ratio between La(2)a and La(2)b is nearly 1:1
- DFT+U Calculation — DFT+U calculations confirm that the Am2m structure naturally accounts for the observed two La(2) sites and their NQR parameters.
- Materials: Quantum Espresso package; PBE functional; Hubbard U = 3.5 eV on Ni-3d orbitals
- Methods: Density Functional Theory plus Hubbard (DFT+U) calculations; Calculation of NQR parameters (νQ, η) for Amam, Am2m, and Am2m structures
- Observations: Calculated NQR parameters for Am2m structure match experimental values for La(2)a and La(2)b; Calculated Ni valences: +2.48 (Nia) and +2.52 (Nib)
- SDW Analysis — The SDW state is identified as a large-tiny spin-stripe structure, where La(2)a couples to tiny-spin Nia sites and La(2)b couples to large-spin Nib sites.
- Materials: NQR spectra in SDW phase; DFT+U calculated EFG tensors
- Methods: Simulation of NQR peak shifts due to internal magnetic fields; Analysis of hyperfine coupling between La(2) sites and Ni moments
- Observations: Asymmetric deformation of NQR spectra below TSDW; Small internal field at La(2)a and large internal field at La(2)b; Ni moments aligned approximately along c-axis
- Interpretation — The SDW order is driven by itinerant Fermi-surface nesting rather than localized magnetic moments, establishing the itinerant nature of the SDW state.
- Materials: Experimental NQR data; DFT+U valence calculations; Bond-valence-sum (BVS) analysis from SXRD
- Methods: Comparison of magnetic moment magnitudes (μNia vs μNib); Comparison of valence contrast from DFT+U vs BVS
- Observations: μNia ≈ 0.13–0.2 μB, μNib ≈ 0.4–0.5 μB; DFT+U valence difference (0.04) is much smaller than BVS estimate (0.4); Magnetic moment ratio inconsistent with localized moment expectation based on valence