Source capture
Authors Xiaoyang Chen, Zezhong Li, Mei Xie, Deyuan Hu, Yiu-Fung Chiu, Stefano Agrestini, Wenliang Zhang, Yi Lu, Meng Wang, Mirian Garcia-Fernandez, Donglai Feng, Ke-Jin Zhou
Relevance score 5.733
Primary category Not available in this batch.
Published Not available in this batch.
Research paradigm Experimental
Sample form Single Crystal

Summary

This study employs resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) to directly compare the electronic and magnetic excitation properties of trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 and bilayer La3Ni2O7. The results show that La4Ni3O10 exhibits more itinerant behavior, evidenced by broader Ni d-d orbital excitations and a stronger fluorescence background, indicating weaker electronic correlations than in the bilayer system. Despite the weaker correlations, clear collective spin excitations are observed, including dispersive acoustic and optical magnon branches as well as incommensurate spin density waves (SDW). Using linear spin-wave theory analysis, the interlayer superexchange interaction Jz is extracted to be approximately 22 meV, significantly smaller than that in La3Ni2O7. The weaker electron correlations and reduced interlayer magnetic exchange together account for the substantially lower superconducting transition temperature of the trilayer compound (about 30 K) compared to the bilayer (about 80 K). This study establishes interlayer magnetic coupling and electronic correlations as key parameters for superconductivity in layered nickelates, providing important constraints for understanding the superconducting pairing mechanism in this emerging family.

Materials

Methods

Keywords

Highlights

  • Our findings establish interlayer magnetic coupling and electronic correlations as key parameters for superconductivity in layered nickelates.
  • Provides critical constraints for understanding the pairing mechanism in this emerging family.

Conclusions

  • La4Ni3O10 exhibits more itinerant behavior and weaker electronic correlations than La3Ni2O7.
  • The interlayer superexchange interaction Jz is about 22 meV, significantly smaller than in La3Ni2O7.
  • Clear collective spin excitations are observed, including dispersive acoustic and optical magnon branches and an incommensurate spin density wave.
  • The weaker electron correlations and reduced interlayer magnetic exchange together account for the substantially lower Tc of the trilayer compound (≈30 K) compared to the bilayer (≈80 K).

Main claims

  • La4Ni3O10 exhibits more itinerant behavior with weaker electronic correlations than bilayer La3Ni2O7, evidenced by broader Ni d-d orbital excitations and stronger fluorescence background.
    • Evidence: Abstract: 'La4Ni3O10 exhibits more itinerant behavior, evidenced by broader Ni d-d orbital excitations and a stronger fluorescence background, indicating weaker electronic correlations'
  • The interlayer superexchange interaction Jz in La4Ni3O10 is approximately 22 meV, significantly smaller than in La3Ni2O7, and combined with weaker correlations accounts for the lower Tc (≈30 K vs ≈80 K).
    • Evidence: Abstract: 'the interlayer superexchange interaction Jz is extracted to be approximately 22 meV, significantly smaller than that in La3Ni2O7… The weaker electron correlations and reduced interlayer magnetic exchange together account for the substantially lower superconducting transition temperature'

Workflow

  • Sample preparation and characterization
    • Materials: La4Ni3O10 single crystals
    • Methods: High-oxygen-pressure floating-zone technique
    • Observations: Monoclinic/orthorhombic structure; Density wave transition at ≈135K
  • RIXS measurements — Trilayer is more itinerant with weaker correlations
    • Materials: Single crystals
    • Methods: Ni L-edge resonant inelastic X-ray scattering; Polarization analysis; Momentum-dependent scans
    • Observations: Broader orbital excitations than in bilayer La3Ni2O7; Stronger fluorescence background; Dispersive acoustic and optical magnon branches; Incommensurate SDW at Q=(0.31, 0.31)
  • Linear spin wave theory analysis — Weaker correlation and reduced interlayer exchange explain lower Tc in trilayer
    • Materials: Extracted magnon dispersion
    • Methods: Bilayer Heisenberg model; SpinW fitting
    • Observations: Interlayer superexchange Jz ≈ 22 meV; In-plane J1 ≈ 29.5 meV, J2 ≈ -21 meV, J3 ≈ 4 meV